|
Post by Admin on Jan 6, 2015 12:39:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Angel Panovski on Jan 6, 2015 13:39:23 GMT -5
I want to ask Mrs Martinez...do the signs are going to save the drowning person at the ships open deck pools? Is the warning sign " swim at your own risk" good enough to save someones life or good enough just to take the responsibility off in case of fatal drowning?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 6, 2015 13:49:24 GMT -5
Good point, @angel! The article above covers that point a bit. It could just be an excuse for cruise lines to not pay extra staff (even though the position of a lifeguard is crucial in that line of work).
|
|
|
Post by kgieger2007 on May 14, 2016 16:51:35 GMT -5
[quote author="Angel Panovski"
source="/post/9/thread" timestamp="1420569563"]I want to ask Mrs Martinez...do the signs are going to save the drowning person at the ships open deck pools? Is the warning sign " swim at your own risk" good enough to save someones life or good enough just to take the responsibility off in case of fatal drowning?[/quote]
Reminds me of when my father fell on a wet floor... Instead of helping jim up, the employee ran and got a wet floor sign. They only use signs to avoid liability. Makes me very angry. A sign can't jump in to save you, or perform CPR. It annoys me that they're too cheap to take the passengers' safety seriously
|
|